On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> wrote: > On 9 April 2013 17:49, Andreas Müller <schnitzelt...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Marco Cavallini <koansoftw...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> * Taken from oe-classic >>> * This patch includes pointercal-xinput >> >> 1. Is this a 'core' component? >> 2. If so: Why not importing from meta-oe there were several >> enhancements (mainline) meanwhile? >> 3. I am again(still) working on this ( systemd/udev plug & play ). It >> would make my life easier if we wait with this migration > > Erm, yeah. I didn't notice this was from oe-classic. My xterm > grumble still applies though! > Yes I had the same feeling (gtk-UI looks much smarter). I would like to address these issues but have some questions:
* xterm: for me it was just a useless package in my image. With the approach I am working on (first shot [1] - but there were some enhancements since then) I simply removed xterm from RDEPENDS assuming people who want manual recalibrating (only those need a terminal for calibration) will take care in their images which terminal to install. Is that OK - or other suggestions? * gtk-UI: Upon what would you suggest to make this decision? Distro feature? If yes: Which entry? [1] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2013-February/043854.html Andreas _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
