On 22 March 2013 10:15, Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 09:08:34AM +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>> On 20 March 2013 16:09:10 Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > * when enable busybox installs getopt to ${base_bindir} and
>> > util-linux to ${bindir}, so there is no file conflict, but
>> > because busybox implementation does not support --long used
>>
>> Do you mean that Busybox' getopt does not support long options?
>> If so, enable FEATURE_GETOPT_LONG in busybox instead of this patch?
>
> Having lsb working correctly even when someone has bad busybox defconfig
> is right thing to do, isn't it?
Probably. That aside, --long being rejected smells like a bug.
>
> busybox's getopt supports --longoptions, but util-linux's also supports
> --long alias for that and that's what lsb is using
>
> $ getopt --longoptions
> getopt: option '--longoptions' requires an argument
> Try `getopt --help' for more information.
> $ getopt --long
> getopt: option '--longoptions' requires an argument
> Try `getopt --help' for more information.
>
> busybox (IIRC even with FEATURE_GETOPT_LONG enabled) reports
> getopt: unrecognized option '--long'
> BusyBox v1.20.2 (2013-03-16 17:45:30 PDT) multi-call binary.
That's odd, it seems to work for me?
$ grep GETOPT .config
CONFIG_GETOPT=y
CONFIG_FEATURE_GETOPT_LONG=y
CONFIG_ASH_GETOPTS=y
$ ./busybox getopt --long 2>&1 | head -n2
getopt: option '--longoptions' requires an argument
BusyBox v1.22.0.git (2013-03-22 11:20:17 CET) multi-call binary.
>
> lsb already RDEPENDS on util-linux, changing lsb to use --longoptions
> would be good, but having /bin/getopt and /usr/bin/getopt without u-a
> to select preferred one is bad, that's why I used this solution instead.
Yes, i see what you mean. Still,
a) it should not be required for lsb to RDEPEND on util-linux since
busybox supposedly should work fine too, iff configured correctly, of course.
b) busybox's getopt --lo (or other substrings of the
-l,--longoptions=LOPT[,...] opt)
should work correctly.
I'd like to know why you trip b) above.
Do you have CONFIG_FEATURE_GETOPT_LONG set?
If so, what libc are you using?
Thanks,
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
