On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 6:48 AM, Jack Mitchell <m...@communistcode.co.uk> wrote: > On 27/02/13 14:42, Khem Raj wrote: >> >> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Jack Mitchell <m...@communistcode.co.uk> >> wrote: >>> >>> On 27/02/13 14:00, Jack Mitchell wrote: >>>> >>>> On 27/02/13 13:56, Jack Mitchell wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 27/02/13 13:52, Jack Mitchell wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On 27/02/13 13:46, Jack Mitchell wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As with the recent binutils texinfo5 compatibility I believe GCC now >>>>>>> also has the same failings, please see attached log. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've had a quick look for patches but I am not at all familiar with >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> GCC development process and I came up empty handed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> >>>>>> Ok, one patch found, there seems to be some @anchor problems too; I'll >>>>>> see if I can dig anything up. >>>>>> >>>>>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2012-07/msg00045.html >>>>>> >>>>> Appologies, that isn't even for GCC :( >>>>> >>>> Ok, this is the patch; I'll look into trying to use it in the GCC >>>> recipes >>>> but they're pretty complicated... >>>> >>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/222861/ >>> >>> >>> Ok, this doesn't apply cleanly and I can't unwind the patch trail to get >>> to >>> this state; if someone knows of a way to do that I would be grateful! >>> >>> >> open a bug for it too > > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3947
Please test http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/45255/ and report back _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
