This commit removes an outdated comment that recorded an issue that has been
resolved in the commits 1c75a5df6845090480deff20f469f177501d2182 and
d2d5456cd3b3bd3e52a5dedccca4d46e3a7986d1. Probably, the comment was missed
when changing the behavior in those commits.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulw...@oss.bmw-carit.de>
---
meta/classes/insane.bbclass | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/classes/insane.bbclass b/meta/classes/insane.bbclass
index 015abd5..3693d42 100644
--- a/meta/classes/insane.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/insane.bbclass
@@ -557,8 +557,6 @@ def package_qa_check_license(workdir, d):
return True
if not lic_files:
- # just throw a warning now. Once licensing data in entered for enough
of the recipes,
- # this will be converted into error and False will be returned.
bb.error(pn + ": Recipe file does not have license file information
(LIC_FILES_CHKSUM)")
return False
--
1.7.9.5
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
