Cool, I'll have a peek at the oe classic recipe and give it a stab along the same spirit.
Best regards, Frans 2013/1/10 Andrea Adami <andrea.ad...@gmail.com> > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Richard Purdie > <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 17:12 +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > >> As I am involved in embedded systems where flash is somewhat sparse > >> I'm always eager to save a few bytes where possible. > >> > >> Today I noticed that mtd-utils (1.5.0 from danny) generates for my > >> architecture (powerpc) roughly 780k of binaries in usr/sbin. 423k of > >> it is due to ubifs related files. > >> > >> Would it be desired to put this in a separate package? > >> > >> e.g. mtd-utils-ubi and mtd-utils-nonubi with mtd-utils itself being > >> empty but rdepend on those two? > >> that way mtd-utils will still give all packages but those only wanting > >> the non ubi stuff can limit themselves to that. > >> > >> If desired I can give this a stab. > > > > Sounds like a sensible split to me... > > > > Cheers, > > > > Richard > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Openembedded-core mailing list > > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > > OE-Classic already has one packaging split: > PACKAGES =+ "mkfs-jffs2 mkfs-ubifs > > Recently I faced this same issue: for ubiattach we have to install > full mtd-utils (>700KiB) > FYI there is a recipe for ubi-utils-klibc for more extreme size > optimization. > > > http://cgit.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/tree/meta-initramfs/recipes-devtools/mtd > > Cheers > > Andrea >
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
