Okay, I will fix it by using python function before sending the final patch. Thanks for your feedback.
--Shakeel -----Original Message----- From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of Otavio Salvador Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 2:14 AM To: Larson, Chris Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/3] [RFC] archive-*-source.bbclass: Handle package class 'package_ipk' On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Christopher Larson <chris_lar...@mentor.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Otavio Salvador > <ota...@ossystems.com.br> > wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Christopher Larson >> <chris_lar...@mentor.com> wrote: >> > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:53 AM, Shakeel, Muhammad >> > <muhammad_shak...@mentor.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> addtask do_archive_scripts_logs after do_package_write_rpm >> >> +addtask do_archive_scripts_logs after do_package_write_ipk >> > >> > >> > This will cause problems for anyone trying to do builds without >> > package_ipk at all. I'd suggest using anonymous python to add the >> > appropriate package dependencies based on what tasks actually >> > exist. >> >> Uh? the only exception for it would be deb, right? > > > Yes, and? So the first patch changing from pre/post commands should be reworked and solve it in the right way. I agree about the use of annonymous python method for it. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
