2012/12/4 Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com>: > On 4 December 2012 12:10, Samuel Stirtzel <s.stirt...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> root@overo:~# ls -l /usr/lib/libEGL.so* >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 21 Dec 4 2012 >> /usr/lib/libEGL.so -> libEGL.so.1.6.16.4117 >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 21 Dec 4 2012 >> /usr/lib/libEGL.so.1 -> libEGL.so.1.6.16.4117 >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 21 Dec 4 2012 >> /usr/lib/libEGL.so.1.6 -> libEGL.so.1.6.16.4117 >> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root avahi-au 0 Dec 3 2012 >> /usr/lib/libEGL.so.1.6.16.4117 > > Have you tried recreating an image? The different group ownership and > timestamp is odd. Who does opkg think provided each of those files, > not just the versioned .so.? > > Ross
This is very strange, as I've checked the image the only corrupted files were the EGL / GLES ones (all tested GTK+ / console applications worked). After re-writing the same image on the same sd-card everything works as expected... Doesn't explain why mesa-dri is being built, but at least the Qt applications work again :) Well it doesn't look like there is a logical cause of this error, so sorry for the noise. -- Regards Samuel _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
