On Wednesday 28 November 2012 15:27:58 Chris Larson wrote: > Also, to comment on something tangentially related from a different thread, > technically the PACKAGE_GROUP_ variables were the first to use the term as > far as I'm aware. *tasks* were then renamed to use that name as well, which > is where a bunch of the confusion probably got introduced.
I did mention that: > PACKAGE_GROUP_* actually came first as a way to > define items for IMAGE_FEATURES that map to one or more packages, and I'm > not sure the name choice was a particularly good one - I wonder if it > would be worth considering renaming it to something like > IMAGE_FEATURE_PACKAGES in order to avoid confusion, although obviously > every rename like this has a cost associated. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
