* Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> [120927 17:44]: > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 04:10:20PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > On Thursday 27 September 2012 00:27:05 Martin Jansa wrote: > > > Please test on more architectures. > > > I've tested complete qt4-native + qt4-free-x11 on armv4t. > > > And only do_patch for nativesdk-qt4-tools, qt-mobility-*, qt4-embedded. > > > > So this is great work and these patches look good, although I'm still not > > particularly happy with breaking out so many of the configure options > > because > > I'm convinced it won't stop here; but it's possible I might be overruled on > > this issue.
> I've added that, because meta-webos layer disables more stuff then .inc > file forces enabled, so I would have to rewrite whole QT_CONFIG_FLAGS > (if I don't want to have e.g. -webkit from .inc and -no-webkit appended > after that through QT_DISTRO_FLAGS). > But it can be just 2 variables instead of 6 if it's issue. I haven't looked closely at the patches, but we're also disabling lots of stuff (though, quite a bit of that comes from meta-oe). Thus, I'm leaning towards an easier way to handle this. We're currently using an approach were we add to QT_CONFIG_FLAGS, to set our desired config, and oe_filter_out() to remove certain defaults from oe-core and meta-oe. Thus, everything that can help reduce this mess is something we'd appreciate. Cheers, Anders -- Anders Darander ChargeStorm AB / eStorm AB _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
