On 09/10/2012 04:19 PM, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 12:49 +0300, Constantin Musca wrote:
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/automake/automake/no-configure.in-warn.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+Don't show a warning if configure.in exists
+
+Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [embedded specific]
+
+Signed-off-by: Constantin Musca <constantinx.mu...@intel.com>
+
+--- a/lib/Automake/Configure_ac.pm
++++ b/lib/Automake/Configure_ac.pm
+@@ -77,8 +77,8 @@ sub find_configure_ac (;@)
+
+ if (-f $configure_in)
+ {
+- msg ('obsolete', "autoconf input should be named 'configure.ac'," .
+- " not 'configure.in'");
++# msg ('obsolete', "autoconf input should be named 'configure.ac'," .
++# " not 'configure.in'");
Why is this change "embedded specific"?
p.
Good question :). The Upstream-Status has to be Inappropriate [
configuration ]. Anyway, this patch will not be merged because we
decided that we have to patch the packages instead to eliminate the warning.
Cheers,
Constantin Musca
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
