On Sat, 2012-08-25 at 01:13 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > On Saturday, August 25, 2012, Koen Kooi <k...@dominion.thruhere.net> > wrote: > > > > Op 25 aug. 2012, om 06:34 heeft tom.zanu...@intel.com het volgende > geschreven: > > > >> From: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanu...@intel.com> > >> > >> This is the ia32-base.inc moved over from meta-intel. See > meta-intel > >> for the complete history of contributions to this file. > >> > >> Here's the initial commit text that explains the purpose of this > file: > >> > >> The meta-intel BSPs currently have a number of machine settings > common > >> to all - factor these out into a common include file. > >> > >> Also add several new intel-specific XSERVER variables for building > >> XSERVER variables in BSPs. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanu...@intel.com> > >> --- > >> meta/conf/machine/include/ia32-base.inc | 58 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> > >> +# glibc-related variables > >> +# > >> +GLIBC_ADDONS ?= "nptl" > > > > That's a distro setting > > And its redundant
I thought you tried removing this and we ran into issues? Regardless, I think this is reason to have this in one place where we can clean it up. I tried to untangle the GLIBC_EXTRA_CONF bit that was here until recently and that was more painful than necessary needing patches to meta-intel and meta-yocto. If we get one good include file, we then have one place to clean this kind of thing up and it stops BSP layers having to do their own things badly. So in summary I think this is a reason to support this change :) Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
