On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Saul Wold <s...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On 08/22/2012 06:31 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>
>> rpm shows error messages like /bin/traceroute6 not found
>> when building cross rootfs
>>
>> Yocto # 2894
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> meta/recipes-extended/iputils/iputils_s20101006.bb | 6 +++---
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/iputils/iputils_s20101006.bb
>> b/meta/recipes-extended/iputils/iputils_s20101006.bb
>> index 62e2b5e..856bde4 100644
>> --- a/meta/recipes-extended/iputils/iputils_s20101006.bb
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/iputils/iputils_s20101006.bb
>> @@ -59,15 +59,15 @@ ALTERNATIVE_${PN}-ping6 = "ping6"
>> ALTERNATIVE_LINK_NAME[ping6] = "${base_bindir}/ping6"
>>
>> pkg_postinst_${PN}-ping () {
>> - chmod 4555 ${base_bindir}/ping
>> + chmod 4555 $D${base_bindir}/ping
>
> So that's the magic! I was trying to figure out what the right prefix was
> in there. I think we need to do an audit of all pkg_postinst, because I saw
> other places where ${xxx} was used or even worse "/etc/..."
>
yes a complete audit will fix many of these kind of issues.
> Sau!
>
>
>> }
>>
>> pkg_postinst_${PN}-ping6 () {
>> - chmod 4555 ${base_bindir}/ping6
>> + chmod 4555 $D${base_bindir}/ping6
>> }
>>
>> pkg_postinst_${PN}-traceroute6 () {
>> - chmod 4555 ${base_bindir}/traceroute6
>> + chmod 4555 $D${base_bindir}/traceroute6
>> }
>>
>> PACKAGES += "${PN}-ping ${PN}-ping6 ${PN}-arping ${PN}-tracepath
>> ${PN}-tracepath6 ${PN}-traceroute6"
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
