On Tuesday 21 August 2012 09:49:37 Paul Eggleton wrote: > The main concern with LSB is that we have something called task-basic, > which seems to be intended for LSB but does not state as much, and I know > at least one person has tried to use it and then been a little puzzled as > to why rpm has been pulled in when ipk packaging has been selected. Just > naming some of these tasks more appropriately would help avoid such > situations. In the specific case of task-basic there may be a case for > creating a similar but not LSB-focused task that pulls in real shell > utilities in preference to the light versions provided by busybox.
Ugh, sorry. I meant task-core-basic here - not to be confused with task-basic in meta-oe [1]. Cheers, Paul [1] http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Meta-oe_tasks -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core