On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Chris Larson <clar...@kergoth.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:06 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 > <b29...@freescale.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 8:08 PM, <b19...@freescale.com> wrote: >>>> echo `cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep model | cut -d "," -f 2 | tr "[A-Z]" >>>> "[a-z]"` >>> >>> $ echo `cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep model | cut -d "," -f 2 | tr "[A-Z]" >>> "[a-z]"` >>> model : 23 model name : intel(r) core(tm)2 quad cpu q9300 @ 2.50ghz >>> model : 23 model name : intel(r) core(tm)2 quad cpu q9300 @ 2.50ghz >>> model : 23 model name : intel(r) core(tm)2 quad cpu q9300 @ 2.50ghz >>> model : 23 model name : intel(r) core(tm)2 quad cpu q9300 @ 2.50ghz >>> >>> is that what we want ? >> >> I think we need an option to turn it on or off and or make it >> configurable from a BSP layer. We are looking for a way to make a rfs >> for all e500v2 or e500mc, etc and say the right machine type on the >> prompt. > > This sounds like something that really does belong in your own > supplementary layer, rather than oe-core.
Seemed like a valuable option for making rfs for multiple machines / targets, but if we don't want it (or some of the bits) in oe-core that's fine by me too. -M > -- > Christopher Larson > clarson at kergoth dot com > Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus > Maintainer - Tslib > Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
