Op 2 aug. 2012, om 21:03 heeft Ross Burton <ross.bur...@intel.com> het volgende 
geschreven:

> On Thursday, 2 August 2012 at 19:38, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> This will still break every platform with a binary libegl and libgles.
> 
> That is true and I'm all ears for suggestions. My best proposal so far is to 
> let a package hint a prefix to the Debian renamer, so these packages get 
> renamed to libmesa-gl, libmesa-egl, etc.
> 
> That said I'm very curious how every platform with a binary libgl isn't 
> already broken.

libegl and libgles aren't built nowadays, so the problem is avoided. Noone has 
dared to touch this subject the past 2.5 years: 
http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded/commit/recipes/mesa?id=3d96f8cb61225d515b5cb4fe863f0d50c3ced436

The best solution[1] is to disable egl/gles in the mesa-recipes and add a 
seperate recipe for them. That way you still get glu and other useful mesa bits 
needed for gnome/efl/xfce/etc, but you can skip the sysroot/shlib poisoning if 
needed.

regards,

Koen

[1] The best solution if of course getting sgx support into mesa, but nothing 
is happening on that front apart from some posturing on the fsf side, no actual 
code.
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to