Op 31 jul. 2012, om 13:26 heeft Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> het volgende geschreven:
> On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 21:01 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: >> * original recipe added by RP in fc128ab1e4fec27d44cebfa690a9bc233eda0caf >> was saying GPL >> * later it was changed to GPLv2 >> * COPYING.GPL was added to reflect that >> * meta-oe has similar recipe with MIT license and even more scripts, so lets >> change LICENSE here too >> >> Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> >> --- >> meta/recipes-core/udev/udev-extraconf/COPYING.GPL | 339 >> --------------------- >> meta/recipes-core/udev/udev-extraconf_1.0.bb | 8 +- >> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 343 deletions(-) >> delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/udev/udev-extraconf/COPYING.GPL > > Er, I think we need to be a little more careful than this. Just because > you want something to be so, doesn't make it happen just like that... > > Looking at the commit, I've just copied the license from the original > source which was a GPLv2 recipe (udev). Where did mount.blacklist come > from originally? Is there evidence its MIT licensed? How did meta-oe > conclude this was MIT licensed? It was written for oe-classic -> MIT licensed _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
