On 07/17/2012 12:40 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
> On 07/17/2012 12:29 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
>> --- a/meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal-initramfs.bb
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal-initramfs.bb
>> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ DESCRIPTION = "Small image capable of booting a device. The
>> kernel includes \
>> the Minimal RAM-based Initial Root Filesystem (initramfs), which finds the
>> \
>> first “init” program more efficiently."
>>
>> -IMAGE_INSTALL = "initramfs-live-boot initramfs-live-install busybox udev
>> base-passwd"
>> +IMAGE_INSTALL = "initramfs-live-boot initramfs-live-install
>> initramfs-live-install-efi busybox udev base-passwd"
>>
>> # Do not pollute the initrd image with rootfs features
>> IMAGE_FEATURES = ""
>
> Does this now need a PR bump also?
I didn't think so as this recipe is rebuilt for every image anyway.
There is no PR in this recipe.
>> diff --git
>> a/meta/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install-efi_1.0.bb
>> b/meta/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install-efi_1.0.bb
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..6696d94
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install-efi_1.0.bb
>> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
>> +DESCRIPTION = "A live image init script for grub-efi"
>> +LICENSE = "MIT"
>> +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM =
>> "file://${COREBASE}/meta/COPYING.MIT;md5=3da9cfbcb788c80a0384361b4de20420"
>> +SRC_URI = "file://init-install-efi.sh"
>> +
>> +PR = "r7"
>> +
> Why PR = r7 for a new recipe, there should be no PR as it defaults to r0?
Good catch, just my forcing rebuilds during development, or perhaps a
left-over copy from the initramfs-live-install_1.0.bb I based it on.
Updated as r0 in the branch.
Thanks,
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
