On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Robert P. J. Day <rpj...@crashcourse.ca>wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jul 2012, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > > On Monday 09 July 2012 11:24:27 Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > On Mon, 9 Jul 2012, Andrei Gherzan wrote: > > > > So IMHO the EXTRA_IMAGE_FEATURES variable in the image should be > > > > merged in the IMAGE_FEATURES above. I don't see the meaning of it. > > > > > > yup, that was precisely the point i was making. so given the > > > potential for confusion, what should be the "best practise" here? > > > based on my sketchy understanding, it seems the proper approach would > > > be to let recipe files use IMAGE_FEATURES exclusively, while > > > specifically reserving EXTRA_IMAGE_FEATURES for the developer's > > > local.conf file, and avoid the current unpleasant mixing. > > > > Sounds like a good idea to me. > > i'll send in a patch that does that, especially since > local.conf.sample specifically instructs the developer to use > EXTRA_IMAGE_FEATURES. patch coming shortly. > > Good. @g
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
