On Fri, 29 May 2026 at 17:52, Quan Sun via lists.openembedded.org
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I looked at your test logs and not sure if you performed the test by
> really using the qemu 11.0.0. (Note the QEMU binary used in the test was
> built from sstate cache (1851 of
> 1852 tasks were cached —
> Sstate summary: Wanted 187 Local 187 ... 100% match, 100% complete),
> meaning it may have used
> whatever QEMU version is already in master's sstate, not a freshly-built
> QEMU 11.0 ?)

This is the second execution of bitbake after everything is already
built in the first execution, and bitbake only needs to run the
testimage task for core-image-minimal. The actual build of the image
and qemu is not in the logs, but I assure you, it's building and using
11.0. You can also see that it's using my
akanavin/package-version-updates branch, not master:

https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/35/builds/3930/steps/9/logs/property_changes
https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=akanavin/package-version-updates

> Regardless of the AI agent, but the earlier test really failed on the
> worker ubuntu2510-vk-1 because that host lacks GPU/DRI3 drivers. Have
> you performed your test on this worker ubuntu2510-vk-1 ?

Yes. You can see at the top of the page that both tests used this worker, e.g.:

https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/35/builds/3930

Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#237765): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/237765
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/119486545/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to