On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 5:59 AM Richard Purdie
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2026-03-10 at 12:38 -0600, Joshua Watt via lists.openembedded.org
> wrote:
> > The dummy SDK packages do not need SPDX support, and since they play
> > some games with allarch that cause problems, it's simplest to disable
> > their SPDX output.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joshua Watt <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > meta/recipes-core/meta/dummy-sdk-package.inc | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/meta/dummy-sdk-package.inc
> > b/meta/recipes-core/meta/dummy-sdk-package.inc
> > index bf453cac9b..71e788b0b9 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-core/meta/dummy-sdk-package.inc
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-core/meta/dummy-sdk-package.inc
> > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ LICENSE = "MIT"
> > PACKAGE_ARCH = "all"
> >
> > inherit allarch
> > +inherit nospdx
> >
> > INHIBIT_DEFAULT_DEPS = "1"
>
> I know why you did this, but after thinking about this, I'm worried and
> I'm not sure this is the right move.
>
> The SDK dummy packages are "odd" but they are actual package files that
> are generated and would be present in manifests and as such, if they're
> missing from the SPDX manifests and docs, this is going to raise
> questions. I appreciate they don't have content and their main use is
> their 'provides'.
>
> Taking a step back, we do support generic/multiple levels of package
> arch and since we support that, the SPDX code does need to handle that
> too. I'm therefore starting to worry that SPDX can't cope with the
> multiple package levels. Can you remind me what the issue is with the
> "all" arch here?
The problem is specifically the anonymous python that does:
d.setVar('PACKAGE_ARCH', '${DUMMYARCH}')
Which seems specifically intended to bypass the allarch logic in a
weird way. It's specifically doing this to put the package in a place
no-one can find it (this includes SPDX); I didn't think it provided
much value hence disabling it, but looking closer, I think we can do:
SSTATE_MULTILIB_SSTATE_ARCHS:append = " ${SDK_PACKAGE_ARCH}"
in create-spdx-sdk-3.0.bbclass and that should fix it. I'll try it.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#232972):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/232972
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/118246396/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
