On Thu Feb 26, 2026 at 7:14 PM CET, Mathieu Dubois-Briand wrote: > On Thu Feb 26, 2026 at 7:09 PM CET, Randolph Sapp wrote: >> On Thu Feb 12, 2026 at 10:45 AM CST, Mathieu Dubois-Briand wrote: >>> On Tue Feb 3, 2026 at 2:20 AM CET, Randolph Sapp via lists.openembedded.org >>> wrote: >>>> From: Randolph Sapp <[email protected]> >>>> >>>> Add emptty, a "Dead simple CLI Display Manager on TTY". This is a >>>> relatively lightweight display manager that supports x11 as well as >>>> wayland through both a CLI and an automatic login mechanism. >>>> >>>> This can effectively replace the custom init scripts for both x11 >>>> (xserver-nodm-init) and wayland (weston-init) with a single tool with >>>> more verbose logging capabilities. >>>> >>>> This is split into two recipes. The emptty package provides the binary >>>> and various agnostic configs while the emptty-conf package provides the >>>> default configuration for the application itself. This RPROVIDES >>>> virtual-emptty-conf, allowing other recipes to provide their own >>>> configurations to override the default behavior. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Randolph Sapp <[email protected]> >>>> --- >>> >>> Hi Randolph, >>> >>> This patch has been in my branch for a week now, but we are seeing some >>> intermittent reproducibility issues. >>> >>> I opened a bugzilla entry by error, as for a second I thought this patch >>> was merged, so details can be found here: >>> https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16171 >>> >>> Diffoscope output is here: >>> https://valkyrie.yocto.io/pub/repro-fail/oe-reproducible-20260212-ssslvz6_/packages/diff-html/ >>> >>> Can you have a look at what is going wrong please? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Mathieu >> >> Now that the source epoch has been addressed [1] should I resubmit this >> version >> of the series? I won't be changing anything since the RFC [2] for the other >> issue reported on this series didn't get any comments. >> >> [1] >> https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/meta?id=70a74fa2bd9c374bd07b89b426a86991b1d93a5f >> [2] https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/topic/117730556 >> >> - Randolph > > Hi Randolph, > > No the action is on my side, I just forgot to take back your series when > I took the source epoch fix. > > It will be part of my next build, thanks for the ping. > > Thanks, > Mathieu
Hi Randolph, Sorry, I come with bad news again: AssertionError: The following rpm packages are different and not in exclusion list: /srv/pokybuild/yocto-worker/reproducible/build/build-st/reproducibleB-extended/tmp/deploy/rpm/./x86_64_v3/emptty-conf-1.0-r0.x86_64_v3.rpm /srv/pokybuild/yocto-worker/reproducible/build/build-st/reproducibleB-extended/tmp/deploy/rpm/./x86_64_v3/emptty-conf-dbg-1.0-r0.x86_64_v3.rpm /srv/pokybuild/yocto-worker/reproducible/build/build-st/reproducibleB-extended/tmp/deploy/rpm/./x86_64_v3/emptty-conf-dev-1.0-r0.x86_64_v3.rpm https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/37/builds/3463 https://valkyrie.yocto.io/pub/repro-fail/oe-reproducible-20260226-7ma9odle/packages/diff-html/ So it looks like the same error as previously. Now, a first idea: is the version on the right side of diffoscope the correct one after your SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH fix? It looks like it is. If that's the case, maybe the left side comes out of sstate from before your SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH patch was applied, and so the test failure is a false positive. Incrementing PR might help to fix this. Any opinion? Thanks, Mathieu -- Mathieu Dubois-Briand, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#232083): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/232083 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/117609031/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
