Hello,

Thank for the patch but it needs improvements:

On Wed Feb 18, 2026 at 12:45 PM CET, Rohini Sangam via lists.openembedded.org 
wrote:
> CVE fixed:
> - CVE-2025-14523 libsoup: Duplicate Host Header Handling Causes Host-Parsing 
> Discrepancy (First- vs Last-Value Wins)
> Upstream-Status: Backport from 
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libsoup/-/commit/383cc02354c2a4235a98338005f8b47ffab4e53a
This patch is not merged is any meaningful branch.

You need to justify why you think this patch is the right patch for this
CVE.

> Signed-off-by: Rohini Sangam <[email protected]>
> ---
>  .../libsoup/libsoup-2.4/CVE-2025-14523.patch  | 79 +++++++++++++++++++
>  .../libsoup/libsoup-2.4_2.74.2.bb             |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 80 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 
> meta/recipes-support/libsoup/libsoup-2.4/CVE-2025-14523.patch
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/libsoup/libsoup-2.4/CVE-2025-14523.patch 
> b/meta/recipes-support/libsoup/libsoup-2.4/CVE-2025-14523.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..3b534a64d5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta/recipes-support/libsoup/libsoup-2.4/CVE-2025-14523.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
> +From 383cc02354c2a4235a98338005f8b47ffab4e53a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> +From: Michael Catanzaro <[email protected]>
> +Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2026 14:50:33 -0600
> +Subject: [PATCH] Reject duplicate Host headers (for libsoup 2)
> +
> +https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libsoup/-/merge_requests/491
> +
> +Upstream-Status: Backport from 
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libsoup/-/commit/383cc02354c2a4235a98338005f8b47ffab4e53a

The proper syntax for this line is:
Upstream-Status: Backport [<URL>]

Regards,
-- 
Yoann Congal
Smile ECS

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#231672): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/231672
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/117873124/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to