On Wed Feb 18, 2026 at 10:28 PM CET, Peter Marko wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Yoann Congal <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 4, 2026 11:10
>> To: Marko, Peter (FT D EU SK BFS1) <[email protected]>;
>> [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [OE-core][scarthgap][PATCH] gnupg: upgrade 2.4.8 -> 2.4.9
>> 
>> On Sat Jan 10, 2026 at 11:44 PM CET, Peter Marko via lists.openembedded.org
>> wrote:
>> > From: Peter Marko <[email protected]>
>> >
>> > Handles CVE-2025-68973.
>> >
>> > Refresh patches.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Peter Marko <[email protected]>
>> > ---
>> >  meta/recipes-support/gnupg/gnupg/relocate.patch    | 14 +++++++-------
>> >  .../gnupg/{gnupg_2.4.8.bb => gnupg_2.4.9.bb}       |  2 +-
>> >  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>> >  rename meta/recipes-support/gnupg/{gnupg_2.4.8.bb => gnupg_2.4.9.bb}
>> (97%)
>> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I've tested that on autobuilder but got an error in oe-selftest-debian:
>> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/?#/builders/35/builds/3138
>>   ERROR: autoconf-native-2.72e-r0 do_recipe_qa: GPG exited with code 2: gpg:
>> signing failed: Corrupted protection
>>   gpg: signing failed: Corrupted protection
>>   ERROR: patch-native-2.7.6-r0 do_recipe_qa: GPG exited with code 2: gpg:
>> signing failed: Corrupted protection
>>   gpg: signing failed: Corrupted protection
>> 
>> I've started a build with this gnupg upgrade reverted to confirm that
>> this is indeed the cause:
>> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/?#/builders/35/builds/3142
>> 
>> Can you look at this?
>> Thanks!
>
> Unfortunately, I'm not able to reproduce this failure.
>
> On my Debian 11 I have:
> SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS = ""
> PACKAGE_CLASSES = "package_rpm"
> RPM_GPG_SIGN_CHUNK = "1"
> IMAGE_CLASSES += 'testimage'
> And run:
> oe-selftest -r signing -j 16
> And get:
> oe-selftest - INFO - RESULTS - 
> signing.LockedSignatures.test_locked_signatures: PASSED (122.35s)
> oe-selftest - INFO - RESULTS - signing.Signing.test_signing_packages: PASSED 
> (155.34s)
> oe-selftest - INFO - RESULTS - signing.Signing.test_signing_sstate_archive: 
> PASSED (121.11s)
> oe-selftest - INFO - oe-selftest - OK - All required tests passed 
> (successes=3, skipped=0, failures=0, errors=0)

FYI, the failing build:
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/?#/builders/35/builds/3138
... was on Debian 12
(It's the retry with this patch reverted that was on Debian 11)

Scarthgap has since been successfully retried on Debian 12 (without this
patch):
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/?#/builders/35/builds/3226

Can you check this on Debian 12?

Thanks!

> So I guess I just backport the CVE fix instead of this upgrade.
>
> Peter
>
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> --
>> Yoann Congal
>> Smile ECS


-- 
Yoann Congal
Smile ECS

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#231426): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/231426
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/117199147/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to