On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > So that's why I felt a bit insulted too when it's my fault that I wasn't > testing all this also on e.g. mips. > > And FWIW as soon as I've discovered there is problem with other archs > I've replied to this patch (saying that other archs need similar patch) > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2012-May/021774.html > and submited site changes for x86/x86-64 where I was able to test it > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2012-May/021779.html > > So if that's not enough to report there is known problem with such patch > I cannot do more and I'll rather go out for a walk in such nice weather.
Yes thats a good. Thing. I think this kind of work might need coordination where you stage it and others can chime in with respective machine details I will try to test your patch on arm,mips,ppc and add appropriate bits. Its better to discuss the downsides early on. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
