> -----Original Message----- > From: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org> On Behalf Of Jose Quaresma via > lists.openembedded.org > Sent: den 28 februari 2025 16:53 > To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > Cc: Jose Quaresma <jose.quare...@foundries.io> > Subject: [OE-core] [RFC OE-core][PATCH 2/4] goarch: switch the default > linking to static > > The dynamic linked standard library > /usr/lib/go/pkg/linux_amd64_dynlink/libstd.so > contains reference to TMPDIR that I couldn't fix and this breakes the > go-runtime.
breakes -> breaks > > The static linking is the default and most used linking in the golang > ecosystem. > Even in more restricted environments such as embedded ones the space occupied > by > the libstd.so and the golang aplications installed on target is considerably > high aplications -> applications > when few golang applications are used, being in the end higher than what it > would > be with static linking. > > When we use static linking we can only use the parts of libstd.so that we > realy realy -> really > need and thus we do not need to have unused features in the runtime system > library. > This way it ends up not even being necessary to install the libstd.so on the > target, > which reduces the total space when there are few applications as already > mentioned. > > Signed-off-by: Jose Quaresma <jose.quare...@foundries.io> > --- > meta/classes-recipe/goarch.bbclass | 12 ++++++------ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta/classes-recipe/goarch.bbclass b/meta/classes- > recipe/goarch.bbclass > index 1ebe03864f..dfe1c64b3b 100644 > --- a/meta/classes-recipe/goarch.bbclass > +++ b/meta/classes-recipe/goarch.bbclass > @@ -38,12 +38,12 @@ BASE_GOARM:armv5 = '5' > # Go supports dynamic linking on a limited set of architectures. > # See the supportsDynlink function in go/src/cmd/compile/internal/gc/main.go The above comment made more sense when GO_DYNLINK was set to 1 for that limited set of architectures below... > GO_DYNLINK = "" > -GO_DYNLINK:arm ?= "1" > -GO_DYNLINK:aarch64 ?= "1" > -GO_DYNLINK:x86 ?= "1" > -GO_DYNLINK:x86-64 ?= "1" > -GO_DYNLINK:powerpc64 ?= "1" > -GO_DYNLINK:powerpc64le ?= "1" > +GO_DYNLINK:arm ?= "" > +GO_DYNLINK:aarch64 ?= "" > +GO_DYNLINK:x86 ?= "" > +GO_DYNLINK:x86-64 ?= "" > +GO_DYNLINK:powerpc64 ?= "" > +GO_DYNLINK:powerpc64le ?= "" > GO_DYNLINK:class-native ?= "" > GO_DYNLINK:class-nativesdk = "" Any reason to keep the overrides? > > -- > 2.48.1 //Peter
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#212084): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/212084 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/111436384/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
