Am Donnerstag, dem 27.02.2025 um 11:44 +0000 schrieb Richard Purdie:
> On Thu, 2025-02-27 at 12:23 +0100, Enrico Jörns wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, dem 27.02.2025 um 11:17 +0000 schrieb Richard Purdie:
> > > On Thu, 2025-02-27 at 10:28 +0100, Enrico Jörns via
> > > lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> > > > This change is done similar to the change in the kernel.bbclass
> > > > of
> > > > commit 8c616bc0 ("kernel: Use consistent make flags for
> > > > menuconfig").
> > > > 
> > > > This was discovered since the new CONFIG_GCC_VERSION kconfig
> > > > symbol
> > > > reflected the host GCC version instead of the target ones after
> > > > running
> > > > do_menuconfig.
> > > > 
> > > > Reported-by: Ulrich Ölmann <u.oelm...@pengutronix.de>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Enrico Jörns <e...@pengutronix.de>
> > > > ---
> > > >  meta/classes-recipe/barebox.bbclass | 1 +
> > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/meta/classes-recipe/barebox.bbclass b/meta/classes-
> > > > recipe/barebox.bbclass
> > > > index 200ba08326..baba0a2965 100644
> > > > --- a/meta/classes-recipe/barebox.bbclass
> > > > +++ b/meta/classes-recipe/barebox.bbclass
> > > > @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ EXTRA_OEMAKE = " \
> > > >      PKG_CONFIG=pkg-config-native \
> > > >      CROSS_PKG_CONFIG=pkg-config \
> > > >  "
> > > > +KCONFIG_CONFIG_COMMAND:append = " ${EXTRA_OEMAKE}"
> > > >  
> > > 
> > > Can we use += here rather than append?
> > 
> > TBH I've copied the line from the kernel.bbclass.
> > I guess this is because of
> > 
> >   KCONFIG_CONFIG_COMMAND ??= "menuconfig"
> > 
> > in the cml1.bbclass.
> > 
> > If I'd replace the weak default there, it should work.
> > 
> > Or would it make sense to just set EXTRA_OEMAKE in cml1.bbclass by
> > default? Like
> > 
> >   KCONFIG_CONFIG_COMMAND ??= "menuconfig ${EXTRA_OEMAKE}"
> 
> Setting it to just include it probably makes the most sense at this
> point. I'm just trying to keep the variables simple!

Sounds good.

> That would affect busybox and u-boot but I suspect they probably need
> the same fix too.

That would be my assumption, too. I'll make a quick check with these to
not break too obvious things and will send a new patch then.

Thanks and regards

Enrico


> Cheers,
> 
> Richard
> 

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Enrico Jörns                |
Embedded Linux Consulting & Support        | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | Phone: +49-5121-206917-180  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-9    |
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#211991): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/211991
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/111412382/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to