Hi, On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 12:07:20PM +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 at 08:54, Mikko Rapeli via lists.openembedded.org > <mikko.rapeli=linaro....@lists.openembedded.org> wrote: > > Could you elaborate why? Some usecase or feature not supported by the python > > wrapper? Which one? > > You got this backwards Mikko. It's you who should elaborate why we > should continue using a custom replacement. > > As long as this change passes the autobuilder, it works as intended, > and needs no further justification.
So changes without justification are fine then? I'm not against this change, I would just like to understand why it's needed or proposed right now. A reason could be just to reduce custom patches in oe-core. That would tell me that no actual usecase is currently broken, apart from ukify.py and secureboot for which I've sent a patch separately and which was seen in meta-arm side testing. Cheers, -Mikko
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#210645): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/210645 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/110958135/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
