On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 at 11:41, Zoltán Böszörményi <zbos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm-sequoia/rpm-sequoia_1.6.0.bb

Let's take the latest version right at this point, which is 1.7.0.

> +# The license line is taken verbatim from Fedora's specfile
> +# with formatting differences for Yocto. (AND -> &, OR -> |)
> +# 
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/rust-rpm-sequoia/1.7.0/3.fc41/src/rust-rpm-sequoia-1.7.0-3.fc41.src.rpm
> +LICENSE = "LGPL-2.0-or-later & Apache-2.0 & BSL-1.0 & MIT & Unicode-DFS-2016 
> & (Apache-2.0 | MIT) & (MIT | Apache-2.0 | Zlib) & (Unlicense | MIT)"

This is the original source, please replace the link:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-rpm-sequoia/blob/rawhide/f/rust-rpm-sequoia.spec

Does the target rpm-sequoia build without issues, or did you try only
the native?

Otherwise, this looks really good, thanks for working through to a
much better recipe :)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#210371): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/210371
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/110875943/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to