On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 at 00:57, Mingyu Wang (Fujitsu) <wan...@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > why). Can you point to the upstream fix that they added to their repo? > > The upstream modify the file configure to fix this bug: > > @@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ WHICH_XTERM=$with_xterm_new > AC_SUBST(WHICH_XTERM) > > case $host_os in > - (*linux-gnu|*cygwin|*mingw32|*msys) > +(linux*gnu|linux*gnuabi64|linux*gnuabin32|linux*gnueabi|linux*gnueabihf|linux*gnux32|uclinux*|gnu*|mint*|k*bsd*-gnu|cygwin|msys|mingw*|linux*uclibc|linux*musl) > want_xterm_kbs=DEL > ;; > (*)
The problem is that upstream doesn't publish individual commits, they just roll everything into 'snapshots', so you need to extract that one change, and make a commit with it. I'd say let's leave the --with-xterm-kbs=del, and wait for the next major release, 6.6 or so when we can drop the setting perhaps. Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#210297): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/210297 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/110639120/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-