On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 at 00:57, Mingyu Wang (Fujitsu) <wan...@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> > why). Can you point to the upstream fix that they added to their repo?
>
> The upstream modify the file configure to fix this bug:
>
> @@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ WHICH_XTERM=$with_xterm_new
> AC_SUBST(WHICH_XTERM)
>
>  case $host_os in
> - (*linux-gnu|*cygwin|*mingw32|*msys)
> +(linux*gnu|linux*gnuabi64|linux*gnuabin32|linux*gnueabi|linux*gnueabihf|linux*gnux32|uclinux*|gnu*|mint*|k*bsd*-gnu|cygwin|msys|mingw*|linux*uclibc|linux*musl)
>          want_xterm_kbs=DEL
>          ;;
>  (*)

The problem is that upstream doesn't publish individual commits, they
just roll everything into 'snapshots', so you need to extract that one
change, and make a commit with it. I'd say let's leave the
--with-xterm-kbs=del, and wait for the next major release, 6.6 or so
when we can drop the setting perhaps.

Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#210297): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/210297
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/110639120/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to