On 9 Jan 2025, at 18:35, Khem Raj via lists.openembedded.org <raj.khem=gmail....@lists.openembedded.org> wrote: > > I know this patch is applied but I still want to bring it to attention > Many packages in other layers depend on fmt. fmt's APIs are not or > not used in a very backward compatible way > some packages provide an option to use vendored version of fmt so in > case of system fmt being not compatible is not > a huge issue other than duplication, but some packages e.g. gerbera > rely on system provided fmt and it still has not moved to > 11.1
If fmt has basically no API stability, should we just have fmt10, fmt11 etc recipes instead? The -dev packages for each of those will conflict as they don’t version the headers, but at least the library packages could be parallel installed. Ross
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#209990): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/209990 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/110453434/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-