Ping

Ross & Richard, is there anything else I need to do for this patch?

Regards,
Qi

-----Original Message-----
From: Chen, Qi 
Sent: Thursday, January 9, 2025 9:54 AM
To: Ross Burton <ross.bur...@arm.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: RE: [OE-core][PATCH V2] lib32-64k-pagesize.inc: add conf for building 
32bit binary with 64K alignment

Hi Ross,

The "./bsp/marvell-cn10xxx" exists in yocto-kernel-cache's origin/yocto-6.6 
branch.
In its master branch, the marvell-cn96xx.cfg also enables 
CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES=y.

This patch was tested on pristine poky + qemuarm64. The test steps are in the 
commit message. I didn't test all softwares in oe-core, but as 
lib32-core-image-full-cmdline started well with no failed systemd service, I 
assumed that most softwares should also behave well. I also tested 
lib32-sysstat with core-image-minimal. 

The help text for ARM64_64K_PAGES changed with this commit: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/db488be354bc85724d7b9523e94435fdaa761a35
So 32bit arm was not supported at first, but at some point, it was.

Regards,
Qi

-----Original Message-----
From: Ross Burton <ross.bur...@arm.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 9, 2025 1:02 AM
To: Chen, Qi <qi.c...@windriver.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [OE-core][PATCH V2] lib32-64k-pagesize.inc: add conf for building 
32bit binary with 64K alignment

On 25 Dec 2024, at 03:04, Chen Qi via lists.openembedded.org 
<Qi.Chen=windriver....@lists.openembedded.org> wrote:
> When 64K page size is enabled, for 32bit multilib, we'll need to build 
> applications with 64K alignment, otherwise, we'll see errors like below at 
> runtime:
> 
>  root@marvell-cn10xxx:~# /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3
>    Segmentation fault
> 
> marvell-cn10xxx in yocto-kernel-cache enables CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES=y by 
> default.
> And the issue was first discovered there.

Do you mean _64K_PAGES?  Where is this marvell-cn100xxx?  In yocto-kernel-cache 
there are no users of arm64-64kb-pages and nothing called cn10xxx.  Is this a 
Wind River-specific fork of yocto-kernel-cache?

> However, there's a kernel config fragment in yocto-kernel-cache which 
> enableds 64K page size for arm64: arch/arm/arm64-64kb-pages.scc. So 
> it's easy for other
> arm64 BSPs to enable this. And when they do so, they'll have problem 
> with multilib. This patch adds a config file to help people a little 
> bit in such situation.
> 
> The max-page-size option is used to fix this issue. This option is 
> added to both CFLAGS and LDFLAGS for the purpose of covering as many 
> recipes as possible.

First, I should point out that changing the page size is an ABI break, and the 
32-bit ABI was formalised long before 64kb pages were a thing, so things _will_ 
break.  That said the loader should work, as a decade ago binutils 2.25 changed 
the alignment to 64kb pages by default:

https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=blobdiff;f=ld/emulparams/armelf_linux.sh;h=280db842208e06e3231ec3a8322369193630a07d;hp=35891f1fc91bddd03677aaefd7146ae5333e6cf0;hb=7572ca8989ead4c3425a1500bc241eaaeffa2c89;hpb=8335d6aa34b88ce31b62e1b578d54ab4aa364435

That won’t help specific pieces of software that eg assume the page size is a 
built-time constant (and use the wrong constant), but helloworld should be 
good.  Can you replicate with pristine poky master and a minimal configuration 
in a qemu?

Ross
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#209933): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/209933
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/110280373/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to