Hi,

On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 08:58:51AM +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 at 08:42, Mikko Rapeli via lists.openembedded.org
> <mikko.rapeli=linaro....@lists.openembedded.org> wrote:
> > >  ...ystemd-boot-native_256.8.bb => systemd-boot-native_256.9.bb} | 0
> > >  .../systemd/{systemd-boot_256.8.bb => systemd-boot_256.9.bb}    | 0
> > >  meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd.inc                           | 2 +-
> > >  .../recipes-core/systemd/{systemd_256.8.bb => systemd_256.9.bb} | 0
> 
> 
> > NACK: must also update systemd and systemd-boot-native recipe versions since
> > systemd, systemd-boot and systemd-boot-native all use systemd.inc.
> 
> The patch actually does this. Is something still missing?

You're right and I was wrong, sorry. I guess v1 of the patch was in current
master-next which was missing systemd recipe update. Would be nice to
change patch title prefix from systemd-boot to systemd though.

Cheers,

-Mikko
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#208628): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/208628
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/110072595/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to