On 17/06/2024 09:31:19-0400, Randy MacLeod wrote: > On 2024-06-17 5:43 a.m., Alexander Kanavin wrote: > > I have to ask, why 1.75.0->1.76.0? Can we go straight to $latest, > > which is 1.79.0 as of now? It's a significant additional effort to do > > incremental updates, and we've fallen so behind that it's perhaps > > better to try to catch up fully. > > > > Alex > > > Yash and Sundeep have updated and tested 1.76, 1.77, 1.78, 1.79 locally > and have not seen any problems. As you know, the situation is > often different when things are tested on the YP autobuilder. The idea > is to test each update so that if there's a reproducability problem or > some other AB specific problem, we have a smaller delta to investigate. > > That said, if Alexandre wants the full series up updates in one > series and sees that 1.79 works, we can try that. > > If there are problems with 1.79 Alex could then test each update > individually in master-next. > > Alexandre, what do you want to do?
I can take a series of incremental patches and I'll bisect if there are any issues. -- Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#200842): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/200842 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/106689695/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
