Hi Mike,
On 5/28/24 7:20 AM, mike.looijm...@topic.nl wrote:
[You don't often get email from mike.looijm...@topic.nl. Learn why this
is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
On 24-05-2024 12:22, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Thu, 2024-05-23 at 15:43 +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote:
I was about to comment on the v2 that this should rather be a class :)
Do we have some information on how/why this is the direction the project
should move towards? What are the pitfalls we're trying to avoid, or
benefits we want to gain? Or is this just some better/best practice we
want to go for?
There was a post from me a while back complaining about repeatedly
splitting class files into smaller less manageable ones so that people
could access some variables without the task/function side effects.
I have a belief that more configuration files would help this kind of
problem and make classes more specific/focused and usable.
Okay, so what is now the way forward? v1 or v2?
Go for what Richard asked, he's the maintainer after all :) I was merely
trying to understand the position of the project, not suggesting we do
something else.
I think you've already sent a v2, so just wait for reviews or for it to
be merged. If it isn't merged in the next few weeks, then send a
reminder as an answer to your v2 asking for feedback.
Cheers,
Quentin
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#199966):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/199966
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/106223409/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
