From: "Mark Hatle via lists.openembedded.org"
<mark.hatle=amd....@lists.openembedded.org>
Code backported from binutils development tree.
aarch64: Remove asserts from operand qualifier decoders [PR31595]
Given that the disassembler should never abort when decoding
(potentially random) data, assertion statements in the
`get_*reg_qualifier_from_value' function family prove problematic.
...
Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.ha...@amd.com>
---
meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.42.inc | 1 +
...ove-asserts-from-operand-qualifier-decode.patch | 382 +++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 383 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/0016-aarch64-Remove-asserts-from-operand-qualifier-decode.patch
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.42.inc
b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.42.inc
index 3b6f47d..d2f4956 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.42.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.42.inc
@@ -36,5 +36,6 @@ SRC_URI = "\
file://0013-Define-alignof-using-_Alignof-when-using-C11-or-newe.patch \
file://0014-Remove-duplicate-pe-dll.o-entry-deom-targ_extra_ofil.patch \
file://0015-gprofng-change-use-of-bignum-to-bigint.patch \
+ file://0016-aarch64-Remove-asserts-from-operand-qualifier-decode.patch \
"
S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
diff --git
a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/0016-aarch64-Remove-asserts-from-operand-qualifier-decode.patch
b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/0016-aarch64-Remove-asserts-from-operand-qualifier-decode.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7b52425
--- /dev/null
+++
b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/0016-aarch64-Remove-asserts-from-operand-qualifier-decode.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,382 @@
+From 5b1c70bfe0d8f84dc28237d6150b7b9d57c791a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Victor Do Nascimento <victor.donascime...@arm.com>
+Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:49:15 +0100
+Subject: [PATCH] aarch64: Remove asserts from operand qualifier decoders
+ [PR31595]
+
+Given that the disassembler should never abort when decoding
+(potentially random) data, assertion statements in the
+`get_*reg_qualifier_from_value' function family prove problematic.
+
+Consider the random 32-bit word W, encoded in a data segment and
+encountered on execution of `objdump -D <obj_name>'.
+
+If:
+
+ (W & ~opcode_mask) == valid instruction
+
+Then before `print_insn_aarch64_word' has a chance to report the
+instruction as potentially undefined, an attempt will be made to have
+the qualifiers for the instruction's register operands (if any)
+decoded. If the relevant bits do not map onto a valid qualifier for
+the matched instruction-like word, an abort will be triggered and the
+execution of objdump aborted.
+
+As this scenario is perfectly feasible and, in light of the fact that
+objdump must successfully decode all sections of a given object file,
+it is not appropriate to assert in this family of functions.
+
+Therefore, we add a new pseudo-qualifier `AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR' for
+handling invalid qualifier-associated values and re-purpose the
+assertion conditions in qualifier-retrieving functions to be the
+predicate guarding the returning of the calculated qualifier type.
+If the predicate fails, we return this new qualifier and allow the
+caller to handle the error as appropriate.
+
+As these functions are called either from within
+`aarch64_extract_operand' or `do_special_decoding', both of which are
+expected to return non-zero values, it suffices that callers return
+zero upon encountering `AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR'.
+
+Ar present the error presented in the hypothetical scenario has been
+encountered in `get_sreg_qualifier_from_value', but the change is made
+to the whole family to keep the interface consistent.
+
+Bug: https://sourceware.org/PR31595
+
+Upstream-Status: Backport [commit 2601b201e95ea0edab89342ee7137c74e88a8a79]
+
+Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.ha...@amd.com>
+---
+ .../testsuite/binutils-all/aarch64/illegal.d | 1 +
+ .../testsuite/binutils-all/aarch64/illegal.s | 3 +
+ include/opcode/aarch64.h | 3 +
+ opcodes/aarch64-dis.c | 98 +++++++++++++++----
+ 4 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/aarch64/illegal.d
b/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/aarch64/illegal.d
+index 4b90a1d9f39..b69318aec85 100644
+--- a/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/aarch64/illegal.d
++++ b/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/aarch64/illegal.d
+@@ -8,5 +8,6 @@ Disassembly of section \.text:
+
+ 0+000 <.*>:
+ [ ]+0:[ ]+68ea18cc[ ]+.inst[ ]+0x68ea18cc ; undefined
++[ ]+4:[ ]+9dc39839[ ]+.inst[ ]+0x9dc39839 ; undefined
+ #pass
+
+diff --git a/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/aarch64/illegal.s
b/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/aarch64/illegal.s
+index 216cbe6f265..43668c6db55 100644
+--- a/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/aarch64/illegal.s
++++ b/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/aarch64/illegal.s
+@@ -4,4 +4,7 @@
+ # ldpsw x12, x6, [x6],#-8 ; illegal because one of the dest regs is
also the address reg
+ .inst 0x68ea18cc
+
++ # illegal, resembles the opcode `ldapur' with invalid qualifier bits
++ .inst 0x9dc39839
++
+ # FIXME: Add more illegal instructions here.
+diff --git a/include/opcode/aarch64.h b/include/opcode/aarch64.h
+index 2fca9528c20..e8fe93ef127 100644
+--- a/include/opcode/aarch64.h
++++ b/include/opcode/aarch64.h
+@@ -894,6 +894,9 @@ enum aarch64_opnd_qualifier
+ /* Special qualifier helping retrieve qualifier information during the
+ decoding time (currently not in use). */
+ AARCH64_OPND_QLF_RETRIEVE,
++
++ /* Special qualifier used for indicating error in qualifier retrieval. */
++ AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR,
+ };
+
+ /* Instruction class. */
+diff --git a/opcodes/aarch64-dis.c b/opcodes/aarch64-dis.c
+index 96f42ae862a..b70e6da9eb7 100644
+--- a/opcodes/aarch64-dis.c
++++ b/opcodes/aarch64-dis.c
+@@ -219,9 +219,10 @@ static inline enum aarch64_opnd_qualifier
+ get_greg_qualifier_from_value (aarch64_insn value)
+ {
+ enum aarch64_opnd_qualifier qualifier = AARCH64_OPND_QLF_W + value;
+- assert (value <= 0x1
+- && aarch64_get_qualifier_standard_value (qualifier) == value);
+- return qualifier;
++ if (value <= 0x1
++ && aarch64_get_qualifier_standard_value (qualifier) == value)
++ return qualifier;
++ return AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR;
+ }
+
+ /* Given VALUE, return qualifier for a vector register. This does not support
+@@ -237,9 +238,10 @@ get_vreg_qualifier_from_value (aarch64_insn value)
+ if (qualifier >= AARCH64_OPND_QLF_V_2H)
+ qualifier += 1;
+
+- assert (value <= 0x8
+- && aarch64_get_qualifier_standard_value (qualifier) == value);
+- return qualifier;
++ if (value <= 0x8
++ && aarch64_get_qualifier_standard_value (qualifier) == value)
++ return qualifier;
++ return AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR;
+ }
+
+ /* Given VALUE, return qualifier for an FP or AdvSIMD scalar register. */
+@@ -248,9 +250,10 @@ get_sreg_qualifier_from_value (aarch64_insn value)
+ {
+ enum aarch64_opnd_qualifier qualifier = AARCH64_OPND_QLF_S_B + value;
+
+- assert (value <= 0x4
+- && aarch64_get_qualifier_standard_value (qualifier) == value);
+- return qualifier;
++ if (value <= 0x4
++ && aarch64_get_qualifier_standard_value (qualifier) == value)
++ return qualifier;
++ return AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR;
+ }
+
+ /* Given the instruction in *INST which is probably half way through the
+@@ -263,13 +266,17 @@ get_expected_qualifier (const aarch64_inst *inst, int i)
+ {
+ aarch64_opnd_qualifier_seq_t qualifiers;
+ /* Should not be called if the qualifier is known. */
+- assert (inst->operands[i].qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_NIL);
+- int invalid_count;
+- if (aarch64_find_best_match (inst, inst->opcode->qualifiers_list,
+- i, qualifiers, &invalid_count))
+- return qualifiers[i];
++ if (inst->operands[i].qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_NIL)
++ {
++ int invalid_count;
++ if (aarch64_find_best_match (inst, inst->opcode->qualifiers_list,
++ i, qualifiers, &invalid_count))
++ return qualifiers[i];
++ else
++ return AARCH64_OPND_QLF_NIL;
++ }
+ else
+- return AARCH64_OPND_QLF_NIL;
++ return AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR;
+ }
+
+ /* Operand extractors. */
+@@ -355,6 +362,8 @@ aarch64_ext_reglane (const aarch64_operand *self,
aarch64_opnd_info *info,
+ aarch64_insn value = extract_field (FLD_imm4_11, code, 0);
+ /* Depend on AARCH64_OPND_Ed to determine the qualifier. */
+ info->qualifier = get_expected_qualifier (inst, info->idx);
++ if (info->qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
++ return 0;
+ shift = get_logsz (aarch64_get_qualifier_esize (info->qualifier));
+ info->reglane.index = value >> shift;
+ }
+@@ -374,6 +383,8 @@ aarch64_ext_reglane (const aarch64_operand *self,
aarch64_opnd_info *info,
+ if (pos > 3)
+ return false;
+ info->qualifier = get_sreg_qualifier_from_value (pos);
++ if (info->qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
++ return 0;
+ info->reglane.index = (unsigned) (value >> 1);
+ }
+ }
+@@ -381,6 +392,8 @@ aarch64_ext_reglane (const aarch64_operand *self,
aarch64_opnd_info *info,
+ {
+ /* Need information in other operand(s) to help decoding. */
+ info->qualifier = get_expected_qualifier (inst, info->idx);
++ if (info->qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
++ return 0;
+ switch (info->qualifier)
+ {
+ case AARCH64_OPND_QLF_S_4B:
+@@ -405,6 +418,8 @@ aarch64_ext_reglane (const aarch64_operand *self,
aarch64_opnd_info *info,
+
+ /* Need information in other operand(s) to help decoding. */
+ info->qualifier = get_expected_qualifier (inst, info->idx);
++ if (info->qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
++ return 0;
+ switch (info->qualifier)
+ {
+ case AARCH64_OPND_QLF_S_H:
+@@ -644,9 +659,15 @@ aarch64_ext_advsimd_imm_shift (const aarch64_operand
*self ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
+ 1xxx 1 2D */
+ info->qualifier =
+ get_vreg_qualifier_from_value ((pos << 1) | (int) Q);
++ if (info->qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
++ return false;
+ }
+ else
+- info->qualifier = get_sreg_qualifier_from_value (pos);
++ {
++ info->qualifier = get_sreg_qualifier_from_value (pos);
++ if (info->qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
++ return 0;
++ }
+
+ if (info->type == AARCH64_OPND_IMM_VLSR)
+ /* immh <shift>
+@@ -773,6 +794,8 @@ aarch64_ext_advsimd_imm_modified (const aarch64_operand
*self ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
+
+ /* cmode */
+ info->qualifier = get_expected_qualifier (inst, info->idx);
++ if (info->qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
++ return 0;
+ switch (info->qualifier)
+ {
+ case AARCH64_OPND_QLF_NIL:
+@@ -1014,6 +1037,8 @@ aarch64_ext_ft (const aarch64_operand *self
ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
+ if (value > 0x4)
+ return false;
+ info->qualifier = get_sreg_qualifier_from_value (value);
++ if (info->qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
++ return 0;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+@@ -1086,6 +1111,8 @@ aarch64_ext_rcpc3_addr_offset (const aarch64_operand
*self ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
+ aarch64_operand_error *errors ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
+ {
+ info->qualifier = get_expected_qualifier (inst, info->idx);
++ if (info->qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
++ return 0;
+
+ /* Rn */
+ info->addr.base_regno = extract_field (self->fields[0], code, 0);
+@@ -1105,6 +1132,8 @@ aarch64_ext_addr_offset (const aarch64_operand *self
ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
+ aarch64_operand_error *errors ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
+ {
+ info->qualifier = get_expected_qualifier (inst, info->idx);
++ if (info->qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
++ return 0;
+
+ /* Rn */
+ info->addr.base_regno = extract_field (self->fields[0], code, 0);
+@@ -1154,6 +1183,8 @@ aarch64_ext_addr_regoff (const aarch64_operand *self
ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
+ /* Need information in other operand(s) to help achieve the decoding
+ from 'S' field. */
+ info->qualifier = get_expected_qualifier (inst, info->idx);
++ if (info->qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
++ return 0;
+ /* Get the size of the data element that is accessed, which may be
+ different from that of the source register size, e.g. in strb/ldrb. */
+ size = aarch64_get_qualifier_esize (info->qualifier);
+@@ -1172,6 +1203,8 @@ aarch64_ext_addr_simm (const aarch64_operand *self,
aarch64_opnd_info *info,
+ {
+ aarch64_insn imm;
+ info->qualifier = get_expected_qualifier (inst, info->idx);
++ if (info->qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
++ return 0;
+
+ /* Rn */
+ info->addr.base_regno = extract_field (FLD_Rn, code, 0);
+@@ -1210,6 +1243,8 @@ aarch64_ext_addr_uimm12 (const aarch64_operand *self,
aarch64_opnd_info *info,
+ {
+ int shift;
+ info->qualifier = get_expected_qualifier (inst, info->idx);
++ if (info->qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
++ return 0;
+ shift = get_logsz (aarch64_get_qualifier_esize (info->qualifier));
+ /* Rn */
+ info->addr.base_regno = extract_field (self->fields[0], code, 0);
+@@ -1228,6 +1263,8 @@ aarch64_ext_addr_simm10 (const aarch64_operand *self,
aarch64_opnd_info *info,
+ aarch64_insn imm;
+
+ info->qualifier = get_expected_qualifier (inst, info->idx);
++ if (info->qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
++ return 0;
+ /* Rn */
+ info->addr.base_regno = extract_field (self->fields[0], code, 0);
+ /* simm10 */
+@@ -2467,6 +2504,8 @@ decode_sizeq (aarch64_inst *inst)
+ if (mask == 0x7)
+ {
+ inst->operands[idx].qualifier = get_vreg_qualifier_from_value (value);
++ if (inst->operands[idx].qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
++ return 0;
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+@@ -2649,6 +2688,8 @@ do_special_decoding (aarch64_inst *inst)
+ idx = select_operand_for_sf_field_coding (inst->opcode);
+ value = extract_field (FLD_sf, inst->value, 0);
+ inst->operands[idx].qualifier = get_greg_qualifier_from_value (value);
++ if (inst->operands[idx].qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
++ return 0;
+ if ((inst->opcode->flags & F_N)
+ && extract_field (FLD_N, inst->value, 0) != value)
+ return 0;
+@@ -2659,6 +2700,8 @@ do_special_decoding (aarch64_inst *inst)
+ idx = select_operand_for_sf_field_coding (inst->opcode);
+ value = extract_field (FLD_lse_sz, inst->value, 0);
+ inst->operands[idx].qualifier = get_greg_qualifier_from_value (value);
++ if (inst->operands[idx].qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
++ return 0;
+ }
+ /* rcpc3 'size' field. */
+ if (inst->opcode->flags & F_RCPC3_SIZE)
+@@ -2670,12 +2713,18 @@ do_special_decoding (aarch64_inst *inst)
+ {
+ if (aarch64_operands[inst->operands[i].type].op_class
+ == AARCH64_OPND_CLASS_INT_REG)
+- inst->operands[i].qualifier = get_greg_qualifier_from_value (value
& 1);
++ {
++ inst->operands[i].qualifier = get_greg_qualifier_from_value
(value & 1);
++ if (inst->operands[i].qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
++ return 0;
++ }
+ else if (aarch64_operands[inst->operands[i].type].op_class
+ == AARCH64_OPND_CLASS_FP_REG)
+ {
+ value += (extract_field (FLD_opc1, inst->value, 0) << 2);
+ inst->operands[i].qualifier = get_sreg_qualifier_from_value
(value);
++ if (inst->operands[i].qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
++ return 0;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+@@ -2709,7 +2758,11 @@ do_special_decoding (aarch64_inst *inst)
+ /* For most related instruciton, the 'size' field is fully available for
+ operand encoding. */
+ if (mask == 0x3)
+- inst->operands[idx].qualifier = get_sreg_qualifier_from_value (value);
++ {
++ inst->operands[idx].qualifier = get_sreg_qualifier_from_value (value);
++ if (inst->operands[idx].qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
++ return 0;
++ }
+ else
+ {
+ get_operand_possible_qualifiers (idx, inst->opcode->qualifiers_list,
+@@ -2744,6 +2797,9 @@ do_special_decoding (aarch64_inst *inst)
+ Q = (unsigned) extract_field (FLD_Q, inst->value, inst->opcode->mask);
+ inst->operands[0].qualifier =
+ get_vreg_qualifier_from_value ((num << 1) | Q);
++ if (inst->operands[0].qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
++ return 0;
++
+ }
+
+ if ((inst->opcode->flags & F_OPD_SIZE) && inst->opcode->iclass ==
sve2_urqvs)
+@@ -2753,7 +2809,11 @@ do_special_decoding (aarch64_inst *inst)
+ inst->opcode->mask);
+ inst->operands[0].qualifier
+ = get_vreg_qualifier_from_value (1 + (size << 1));
++ if (inst->operands[0].qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
++ return 0;
+ inst->operands[2].qualifier = get_sreg_qualifier_from_value (size);
++ if (inst->operands[2].qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
++ return 0;
+ }
+
+ if (inst->opcode->flags & F_GPRSIZE_IN_Q)
+@@ -2772,6 +2832,8 @@ do_special_decoding (aarch64_inst *inst)
+ assert (idx == 0 || idx == 1);
+ value = extract_field (FLD_Q, inst->value, 0);
+ inst->operands[idx].qualifier = get_greg_qualifier_from_value (value);
++ if (inst->operands[idx].qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
++ return 0;
+ }
+
+ if (inst->opcode->flags & F_LDS_SIZE)
+--
+2.34.1
+
--
1.8.3.1
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#199938):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/199938
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/106336537/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
