On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 07:15:32AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 02:17:02PM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:05:25PM +0000, Richard Purdie wrote: > >> > On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 19:56 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > >> > > Get new patches and remove the one that got merged upstream > >> > > > >> > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> > >> > > --- > >> > > .../eglibc/eglibc-2.15/GLRO_dl_debug_mask.patch | 108 > >> > > ++++++++++++++++++++ > >> > > .../eglibc-2.15/armv4-eabi-compile-fix.patch | 25 ----- > >> > > .../eglibc/eglibc-2.15/initgroups_keys.patch | 20 ++++ > >> > > meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc_2.15.bb | 5 +- > >> > > 4 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) > >> > > create mode 100644 > >> > > meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc-2.15/GLRO_dl_debug_mask.patch > >> > > delete mode 100644 > >> > > meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc-2.15/armv4-eabi-compile-fix.patch > >> > > create mode 100644 > >> > > meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc-2.15/initgroups_keys.patch > >> > > >> > Since 2.15 isn't the default I'm tempted to merge this despite the point > >> > we're at in the release cycle. I'd like to give anyone using this the > >> > opportunity to comment first though. > >> > >> I'm testing this on all archs I'm using (armv4t, armv5te, armv7a, > >> x86-64) and will report tomorrow. > > > > Doesn't look related to this change, but I got interesing error on other > > buildhost (on mine everything seems fine sofar including tests on > > target), I don't have log from armv4t build on mine, because it's on tmpfs > > and there was unexpected reboot when I wasn't home :/. > > Hi Martin > > Does it look good for your testing ?
Seems fine in runtime any hint about that build issue? Today I got another one :/ "build-x86_64-oe-linux/shlib.lds:127: syntax error while building eglibc I had reports about this before, but wasn't able to reproduce it on my machine, today I got it for first time (maybe because of building with -j8 instead of -j4), so I've created simple testcase to compare interim outputs from shlib.lds creation: http://build.shr-project.org/tests/jama/shlib-issue/ Cheers, -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
