meta-rust is generally seen as obsolete, is there a particular reason
you need to use it with oe-core master, instead of the standard rust
recipes?

Even then, this looks like it needs to be fixed in meta-rust, rather
than individual recipes. The error does not occur with official rust
toolchain, so meta-rust should just copy what that does.

Alex

On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 06:03, nikhil <nikhilar2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> When using meta-rust layer for rust below
> do_package_qa error in librsvg is observed
>
> Fix the below error:
> ERROR: librsvg-2.52.10-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: File /usr/bin/rsvg-convert 
> in package rsvg doesn't have GNU_HASH (didn't pass LDFLAGS?) File 
> /usr/bin/rsvg-convert in package rsvg doesn't have GNU_HASH (didn't pass 
> LDFLAGS?) [ldflags] ERROR: librsvg-2.52.10-r0 do_package_qa: Fatal QA errors 
> were found, failing task.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nikhil R <nikhi...@kpit.com>
> ---
>  meta/recipes-gnome/librsvg/librsvg_2.56.3.bb | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-gnome/librsvg/librsvg_2.56.3.bb 
> b/meta/recipes-gnome/librsvg/librsvg_2.56.3.bb
> index 9824b8898d..e6eece6858 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-gnome/librsvg/librsvg_2.56.3.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-gnome/librsvg/librsvg_2.56.3.bb
> @@ -77,3 +77,5 @@ FILES:librsvg-gtk = "${libdir}/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/*/*/*.so \
>  RRECOMMENDS:librsvg-gtk = "gdk-pixbuf-bin"
>
>  PIXBUF_PACKAGES = "librsvg-gtk"
> +
> +TARGET_CC_ARCH += "${LDFLAGS}"
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
> 
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#196847): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/196847
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/104803790/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to