On 26.03.2012 13:34, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 21:17 +0100, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
>> On 12.03.2012 16:53, Richard Purdie wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 10:29 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
>>>> On 3/9/12 8:15 PM, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
>>>>> * Explicitly set umask to 022. Otherwise the build system's
>>>>> umask leaks into the image.
>>>>
>>>> I'm surprised that do_package_ipk[umask] didn't work. Perhaps its the way
>>>> it's
>>>> being invoked that is the issue. (If bitbake doesn't run it, but
>>>> something else
>>>> does.. then the umask setting doesn't get used.)
>>>>
>>>> As for the change of the umask, the changes appear to be specific to the
>>>> ipk
>>>> case. Is this the desired behavior, or could deb and rpm suffer from
>>>> similar
>>>> issues? (I'm not familiar enough with opkg to know how it handles umask
>>>> settings during package install/rootfs construction..)
>>>>
>>>> I believe that RPM sets a default umask when it goes through it's package
>>>> installs/rootfs generation. But does DEB?
>>>
>>> I'm also a bit worried about this patch. I'd like to understand why a
>>> task level umask doesn't work. That shouldn't even make any difference
>>> since the permissions/owners/users from install should be getting
>>> used...
>>
>> can you please give some advise on how to continue with this issue?
>
> I understand half the problem now, the files with the issues are ones
> created during the package_ipk task. That addresses one of my big
> concerns.
>
> The second thing I'd like to understand is why a task level umask
> doesn't resolve this. Looking at what you tried, this might be as simple
> as a typo:
>
> do_package_ipk[umask] = "022"
>
> when you really want:
>
> do_package_write_ipk[umask] = "022"
Richard,
thank you, that did it. It wasn't a typo, but lack of understanding of
the "magic" behind it, as I tried to apply the umask to the
do_package_ipk function instead of the do_package_write_ipk *task*.
Please see below for an updated patch.
Regards,
Andreas
> If that works, lets set this for deb and rpm too so we're consistent and
> I'll merge that patch :)
>From f9e4707d7a619e29530ac144ae1aba9d9e406884 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andreas Oberritter <o...@opendreambox.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:11:57 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] package_{deb,ipk,rpm}: apply umask to files generated in
do_package_write_{deb,ipk,rpm}
* Explicitly set umask to 022. Otherwise the build system's
umask may leak into the image.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Oberritter <o...@opendreambox.org>
---
meta/classes/package_deb.bbclass | 1 +
meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass | 1 +
meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass | 1 +
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/classes/package_deb.bbclass b/meta/classes/package_deb.bbclass
index 1f7ec9c..9880258 100644
--- a/meta/classes/package_deb.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/package_deb.bbclass
@@ -421,6 +421,7 @@ python do_package_write_deb () {
bb.build.exec_func("do_package_deb", d)
}
do_package_write_deb[dirs] = "${PKGWRITEDIRDEB}"
+do_package_write_deb[umask] = "022"
addtask package_write_deb before do_package_write after do_package
diff --git a/meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass b/meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass
index 565ef93..e4a217b 100644
--- a/meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass
@@ -453,6 +453,7 @@ python do_package_write_ipk () {
bb.build.exec_func("do_package_ipk", d)
}
do_package_write_ipk[dirs] = "${PKGWRITEDIRIPK}"
+do_package_write_ipk[umask] = "022"
addtask package_write_ipk before do_package_write after do_package
PACKAGEINDEXES += "package_update_index_ipk;"
diff --git a/meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass b/meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass
index e83fc55..daa9301 100644
--- a/meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass
@@ -1056,6 +1056,7 @@ python do_package_write_rpm () {
}
do_package_write_rpm[dirs] = "${PKGWRITEDIRRPM}"
+do_package_write_rpm[umask] = "022"
addtask package_write_rpm before do_package_write after do_package
PACKAGEINDEXES += "package_update_index_rpm; createrepo ${DEPLOY_DIR_RPM};"
--
1.7.5.4
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
