On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 at 11:24, Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > There is another report about issues from the shadow static linking > change. > > I'm worried that there are now accesses to files with are out of sight > of pseudo so that some combinations of builds are breaking. I'd > forgotten about pseudo in the push to fix the various sstate issues. It > is worrying we don't have good test cases for these. > > I've also been thinking about how we could solve it. My proposal is > that we go back to dyanmic linking, however we add copies of the libs > we need into the shadow-native populate_sysroot sstate/sysroot output > in a special directory and we add that directory to the shadow binaries > as a RUNPATH/RPATH.
Sounds good. I'll make a patch for this. Static linking in C world is something of an 'obsolete technology', it isn't tested or supported by anyone really. Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#194028): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/194028 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/103661547/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
