On 10/19/23 17:21, Michael Opdenacker wrote: > Hi Yoann Hi, > On 19.10.23 at 10:00, Yoann Congal wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> We recently implemented a way to detect recipes for upstream code that >> contain unit tests but does not implement ptests. >> Those recipes make good candidates for increasing the ptests coverage. >> >> This is implemented as a QA check. The check is disabled by default since it >> generates a lot of warning at build. >> In order to activate it (in local.conf for exemple) : >> WARN_QA += "unimplemented-ptest" >> >> The warnings looks like: >> WARNING: time-1.9-r0 do_patch: QA Issue: time: autotools-based tests >> detected [unimplemented-ptest] >> I've generated the list for the unimplemented ptests for oe-core and for >> meta-openembedded: >> 329 unimplemented-ptests_oe-core.log: >> https://gist.github.com/ycongal-smile/dd51b0e450a8f0083e9d5cc10eeeb060#file-unimplemented-ptests_oe-core-log >> 1080 unimplemented-ptests_meta-openembedded.log: >> https://gist.github.com/ycongal-smile/dd51b0e450a8f0083e9d5cc10eeeb060#file-unimplemented-ptests_meta-openembedded-log > > Thanks, indeed, I "own" recipes that were flagged :) > Maybe, you could find a way to notify the maintainers of such recipes, as in > the AUH upgrade status reports > (https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/188589 for > example).
Good idea, Thanks! I've created a bug to not forget : 15249 – Notify the maintainers of unimplemented ptests https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15249 I've CC'd you :) Regards, -- Yoann Congal Smile ECS - Tech Expert
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#189505): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/189505 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/102056219/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
