On Thu, 28 Sept 2023 at 18:49, Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > I've wondered if we should split bitbake -S printdiff into a separate > utility? It exists from a time before we had bitbake command APIs.
It can also be a simple shell wrapper. I've separated -S lockedsigs into it's own option as well, so it can be explicitly requested (just need to fix up a couple of selftests that relied on -S none to get locked-sigs.inc): https://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib/commit/?h=akanavin/sstate-for-all&id=41e8a8a79bac4e3b9eb74a99e32e0d26ac8af0c5 > I'm curious to see what you find with analysis of bitbake-whatchanged. > I'm also somewhat surprised the scenarios you're testing all work! It's not 100% perfect. One out of 2*3=6 scenarios isn't fully functional (gcc-source:do_preconfigure signature isn't found from sstate even though it exists there - but it is found if it's in tmp/stamps/). I left a FIXME in the test. Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#188377): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/188377 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/101501384/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
