On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Paul Eggleton <paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > Hi Bruce, > > On Wednesday 14 March 2012 08:29:20 Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> In this case, you wouldn't go through the fragments, you'd just add one that >> turns it on when you want it. Don't audit a defconfig, push the few options >> that you want onto the build. > > I'm not sure what you mean here, in the context of generically figuring out > whether lzma is needed...?
Maybe I misread/misunderstood the question at hand then :) Let me just rephrase it this way, we have the recipe and the control in this case, so adding the dependency and making sure that the kernel option to use it via a config fragment is valid .. which is what you did, minus the fragment, and we don't really need the fragment, since we know it is on. You could audit the constructed .config as well, since that's the final word on whether it actually makes it into the kernel build, but also not really required here. So consider this random noise, before I drank my coffee this morning :) Cheers, Bruce > > Cheers, > Paul > > -- > > Paul Eggleton > Intel Open Source Technology Centre -- "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end" _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
