On Wed, 2023-04-19 at 23:34 +0100, Jose Quaresma wrote: > Hi, > > Not related with the previous discussion but just for > your information. > The rm_work.bbclass has an exception for the kernel recipes [1]. > So I don't understand why we can't do the same for the make-mod- > scripts > who is the twin brother of all these kernel recipes. > > [1] > https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/tree/meta/classes/rm_work.bbclass#n168
Ideally we wouldn't be doing this for the kernel recipes. There is also a big difference to that and the proposed patch. The proposed patch was preserving a specific directory rather than an entire recipe. Removing the task stamps but leaving a small piece of WORKDIR is quite different to preserving WORKDIR and STAMPS for a specific recipe. The former is not tested and will break things. The latter is better tolerated by bitbake. So yes, we could do the same. I'm sure there will be other recipes people want to preserve for other reasons. Where do we draw the line? We could preserve everything and drop rm_work, then we wouldn't have these problems? :) Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#180231): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/180231 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/98296212/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
