Ok thanks.

Le ven. 31 mars 2023, 17:55, Alexander Kanavin <alex.kana...@gmail.com> a
écrit :

> You need to set up two identical builds in different build directories
> and verify that what gets installed and packaged is identical (in this
> case it's not). The most common problem is build paths leaking into
> the binaries or other installed artifacts, and it can be tricky to
> narrow it down to a specific point where it happens in a build.
>
> The broader rationale for doing this is here
> https://reproducible-builds.org/
>
> Alex
>
> On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 at 17:01, Frédéric Martinsons
> <frederic.martins...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Ok I'll take a look at this next week. But I don't know anything about
> reproductability build so if you have any info that can point me to the
> right direction, I'll be glad to read it.
> >
> > Le ven. 31 mars 2023, 15:50, Alexander Kanavin <alex.kana...@gmail.com>
> a écrit :
> >>
> >> On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 at 15:26, Richard Purdie
> >> <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >> > > > We do have other reproducibility issues in rust and had to
> exclude some
> >> > > > packages from the test because of this. We do want to resolve
> those
> >> > > > issues though.
> >> > >
> >> > > But aren't recipes in meta-selftest exempted from reproducibility
> requirement?
> >> >
> >> > I suspect we can put an EXCLUDE_FROM_WORLD = "1" in there and then
> this
> >> > will "go away" but shouldn't our output be reproducible and isn't this
> >> > therefore actually a good test?
> >>
> >> That's true. There's also rust itself which continues to be the only
> >> item in core that's in the reproducibility exception list.
> >>
> >> Alex
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#179452): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/179452
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/97967793/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to