On Sun, 2023-02-26 at 22:43 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 5:56 PM Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 3:34 PM Alexandre Belloni > > <alexandre.bell...@bootlin.com> wrote: > > > > > > Could this be the cause of this? > > > > > > https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/repro-fail/oe-reproducible-20230223-79c9rmcw/packages/diff-html/ > > > > most likely yes. I will take a look. Lets work on merging the other > > binutils and gdb upgrade patch meanwhile. > > I looked at the diffoscope outputs you posted and it is noting the > difference in EFL flags > > changing from > 0x0000000000000018 (BIND_NOW) > to > 0x000000000000001e (FLAGS) BIND_NOW > > However, in my local build I see that when I enable --enable-new-dtags > than I always get > 0x000000000000001e (FLAGS) BIND_NOW > > > but when I check the glibc builds without the patch then I get flags > to be 0x0000000000000018 > > So I wonder if we are comparing previously built glibc ( using > binutils without this patch ) > with glibc compiled with binutils using this patch.
I think that is possible and there is some task hash dependency issue in here somewhere :/ Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#177776): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/177776 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/97178429/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
