* remove patch applied upstream
* FWIW: this version still fails to build with DEBUG_BUILD AND gcc-13 as
shown in:
http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/689841/
In file included from
TOPDIR/tmp-glibc/work/core2-64-oe-linux/python3-numpy/1.24.1-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib/x86_64-oe-linux/gcc/x86_64-oe-linux/13.0.1/include/immintrin.h:57,
from
TOPDIR/tmp-glibc/work/core2-64-oe-linux/python3-numpy/1.24.1-r0/numpy-1.24.1/numpy/distutils/checks/cpu_avx512_knl.c:14:
In function '_mm512_mask_prefetch_i64scatter_pd',
inlined from 'main' at
TOPDIR/tmp-glibc/work/core2-64-oe-linux/python3-numpy/1.24.1-r0/numpy-1.24.1/numpy/distutils/checks/cpu_avx512_knl.c:23:5:
TOPDIR/tmp-glibc/work/core2-64-oe-linux/python3-numpy/1.24.1-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib/x86_64-oe-linux/gcc/x86_64-oe-linux/13.0.1/include/avx512pfintrin.h:180:3:
error: 'base' may be used uninitialized [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
180 | __builtin_ia32_scatterpfqpd (__mask, (__v8di) __index, __addr,
__scale,
|
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
181 | __hint);
| ~~~~~~~
<built-in>: In function 'main':
<built-in>: note: by argument 3 of type 'const void *' to
'__builtin_ia32_scatterpfqpd' declared here
TOPDIR/tmp-glibc/work/core2-64-oe-linux/python3-numpy/1.24.1-r0/numpy-1.24.1/numpy/distutils/checks/cpu_avx512_knl.c:18:9:
note: 'base' declared here
18 | int base[128];
| ^~~~
In file included from
TOPDIR/tmp-glibc/work/core2-64-oe-linux/python3-numpy/1.24.1-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib/x86_64-oe-linux/gcc/x86_64-oe-linux/13.0.1/include/immintrin.h:53,
from numpy/core/src/umath/simd.inc.src:25:
TOPDIR/tmp-glibc/work/core2-64-oe-linux/python3-numpy/1.24.1-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib/x86_64-oe-linux/gcc/x86_64-oe-linux/13.0.1/include/avx512fintrin.h:
In function 'AVX512F_square_CFLOAT':
TOPDIR/tmp-glibc/work/core2-64-oe-linux/python3-numpy/1.24.1-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib/x86_64-oe-linux/gcc/x86_64-oe-linux/13.0.1/include/avx512fintrin.h:314:1:
error: inlining failed in call to 'always_inline' '_mm512_setzero_ps': target
specific option mismatch
314 | _mm512_setzero_ps (void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
numpy/core/src/umath/simd.inc.src:977:20: note: called from here
977 | @vtype@ zeros = _mm512_setzero_@vsuffix@();
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
numpy/core/src/umath/simd.inc.src:596:1: error: inlining failed in call to
'always_inline' 'avx512_get_full_load_mask_ps': target specific option mismatch
596 | avx512_get_full_load_mask_ps(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It will be probably resolved in next release from 1.25 as whole simd.inc.src
was removed in:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/commit/640e85017aa8eac3e9be68b475acf27d623b16b7
but this PR https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/21056 wasn't backported
to maintenance/1.24.x and probably isn't worth backporting now as
neither DEBUG_BUILD is enabled by default nor gcc-13 merged in oe-core,
and the changes don't backport cleanly.
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com>
---
...ing-_Alignof-when-using-C11-or-newer.patch | 77 -------------------
...umpy_1.24.1.bb => python3-numpy_1.24.2.bb} | 3 +-
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 79 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644
meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3-numpy/0001-Define-_ALIGN-using-_Alignof-when-using-C11-or-newer.patch
rename meta/recipes-devtools/python/{python3-numpy_1.24.1.bb =>
python3-numpy_1.24.2.bb} (93%)
diff --git
a/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3-numpy/0001-Define-_ALIGN-using-_Alignof-when-using-C11-or-newer.patch
b/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3-numpy/0001-Define-_ALIGN-using-_Alignof-when-using-C11-or-newer.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 97391e2c12..0000000000
---
a/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3-numpy/0001-Define-_ALIGN-using-_Alignof-when-using-C11-or-newer.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,77 +0,0 @@
-From f9ac08a0fea543d68b2dba540093bd079e50be47 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com>
-Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2023 15:49:09 -0800
-Subject: [PATCH] Define _ALIGN using _Alignof when using C11 or newer
-
-WG14 N2350 made very clear that it is an UB having type definitions
-within "offsetof" [1]. This patch enhances the implementation of macro
-_ALIGN to use builtin "_Alignof" to avoid undefined behavior on
-when using std=c11 or newer
-
-clang 16+ has started to flag this [2]
-
-Fixes build when using -std >= gnu11 and using clang16+
-
-Older compilers gcc < 4.9 or clang < 8 has buggy _Alignof even though it
-may support C11, exclude those compilers too
-
-[1] https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2350.htm
-[2] https://reviews.llvm.org/D133574
-
-Upstream-Status: Submitted [https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/23016]
-Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com>
----
- numpy/core/src/multiarray/arraytypes.c.src | 13 +++++++++++--
- numpy/core/src/multiarray/common.h | 12 +++++++++++-
- 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/numpy/core/src/multiarray/arraytypes.c.src
b/numpy/core/src/multiarray/arraytypes.c.src
-index c03d09784..683917220 100644
---- a/numpy/core/src/multiarray/arraytypes.c.src
-+++ b/numpy/core/src/multiarray/arraytypes.c.src
-@@ -224,8 +224,17 @@ MyPyLong_AsUnsigned@Type@(PyObject *obj)
- ** GETITEM AND SETITEM **
- *****************************************************************************
- */
--
--#define _ALIGN(type) offsetof(struct {char c; type v;}, v)
-+/* GCC releases before GCC 4.9 had a bug in _Alignof. See GCC bug 52023
-+ <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52023>.
-+ clang versions < 8.0.0 have the same bug. */
-+#if (!defined __STDC_VERSION__ || __STDC_VERSION__ < 201112 \
-+ || (defined __GNUC__ && __GNUC__ < 4 + (__GNUC_MINOR__ < 9) \
-+ && !defined __clang__) \
-+ || (defined __clang__ && __clang_major__ < 8))
-+# define _ALIGN(type) offsetof(struct {char c; type v;}, v)
-+#else
-+# define _ALIGN(type) _Alignof(type)
-+#endif
- /*
- * Disable harmless compiler warning "4116: unnamed type definition in
- * parentheses" which is caused by the _ALIGN macro.
-diff --git a/numpy/core/src/multiarray/common.h
b/numpy/core/src/multiarray/common.h
-index 3de8c842d..d01074c45 100644
---- a/numpy/core/src/multiarray/common.h
-+++ b/numpy/core/src/multiarray/common.h
-@@ -178,7 +178,17 @@ check_and_adjust_axis(int *axis, int ndim)
- }
-
- /* used for some alignment checks */
--#define _ALIGN(type) offsetof(struct {char c; type v;}, v)
-+/* GCC releases before GCC 4.9 had a bug in _Alignof. See GCC bug 52023
-+ <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52023>.
-+ clang versions < 8.0.0 have the same bug. */
-+#if (!defined __STDC_VERSION__ || __STDC_VERSION__ < 201112 \
-+ || (defined __GNUC__ && __GNUC__ < 4 + (__GNUC_MINOR__ < 9) \
-+ && !defined __clang__) \
-+ || (defined __clang__ && __clang_major__ < 8))
-+# define _ALIGN(type) offsetof(struct {char c; type v;}, v)
-+#else
-+# define _ALIGN(type) _Alignof(type)
-+#endif
- #define _UINT_ALIGN(type) npy_uint_alignment(sizeof(type))
- /*
- * Disable harmless compiler warning "4116: unnamed type definition in
---
-2.39.0
-
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3-numpy_1.24.1.bb
b/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3-numpy_1.24.2.bb
similarity index 93%
rename from meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3-numpy_1.24.1.bb
rename to meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3-numpy_1.24.2.bb
index adac08b3e1..78a857bf16 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3-numpy_1.24.1.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3-numpy_1.24.2.bb
@@ -10,10 +10,9 @@ SRCNAME = "numpy"
SRC_URI = "${GITHUB_BASE_URI}/download/v${PV}/${SRCNAME}-${PV}.tar.gz \
file://0001-Don-t-search-usr-and-so-on-for-libraries-by-default-.patch \
file://0001-numpy-core-Define-RISCV-32-support.patch \
-
file://0001-Define-_ALIGN-using-_Alignof-when-using-C11-or-newer.patch \
file://run-ptest \
"
-SRC_URI[sha256sum] =
"2386da9a471cc00a1f47845e27d916d5ec5346ae9696e01a8a34760858fe9dd2"
+SRC_URI[sha256sum] =
"003a9f530e880cb2cd177cba1af7220b9aa42def9c4afc2a2fc3ee6be7eb2b22"
GITHUB_BASE_URI = "https://github.com/numpy/numpy/releases";
UPSTREAM_CHECK_REGEX = "releases/tag/v?(?P<pver>\d+(\.\d+)+)$"
--
2.39.1
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#177176):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/177176
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/96972390/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
