Hi Alex,
Yes, that's exactly the reason. I'm particularly concerned about dependency on glib, but other dependencies are unnecessary, too. This change was sufficient to remove the dependency from the target. I am not aware of potential consequences of removing the -native dependencies, but if you think it should also be done, I'm happy to update the patch. Please let me know. Petr ________________________________ From: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kana...@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2023 12:59:58 PM To: alex.kana...@gmail.com Cc: Petr Kubizňák - 2N; openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [OE-core][PATCH 1/2] gobject-introspection: check for GI_DATA_ENABLED I mean, if you want to do this to reduce dependency chains, then depending on qemu-native and g-i-native isn't necessary either. But the patch as it is seems like going halfway. Alex On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 at 12:54, Alexander Kanavin via lists.openembedded.org <alex.kanavin=gmail....@lists.openembedded.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 at 12:46, Petr Kubizňák <kubiz...@2n.com> wrote: > > When GI_DATA_ENABLED is 'False' (e.g. because > > 'gobject-introspection-data' is not in DISTRO_FEATURES), > > gobject-introspection should not be added to DEPENDS. > > Why? > > Alex > > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#175472): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/175472 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/96048399/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
