On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 02:01:06PM +0000, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-02-18 at 12:56 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 02:36:48PM -0800, Saul Wold wrote:
> > > On 02/13/2012 07:40 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > > > * seems like config/config in -L was also wrong
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa<martin.ja...@gmail.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb-cross-canadian.inc | 10 ++++++++--
> > > > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb-cross-canadian.inc
> > > > b/meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb-cross-canadian.inc
> > > > index b5746ce..bac63b7 100644
> > > > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb-cross-canadian.inc
> > > > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb-cross-canadian.inc
> > > > @@ -10,12 +10,18 @@ RDEPENDS += "python-nativesdk-core
> > > > python-nativesdk-lang python-nativesdk-re \
> > > >
> > > > EXTRA_OECONF_append = "--with-python=${WORKDIR}/python"
> > > >
> > > > +NATIVESDK_NAME = "oecore-${SDK_ARCH}-${SDK_ARCH}"
> > > > +NATIVESDK_PATH = "/usr/local/${NATIVESDK_NAME}"
> >
> > Ah, I was reusing definition from bitbake.conf:
> > meta/conf/bitbake.conf:SDK_NAME = "oecore-${SDK_ARCH}-${TARGET_ARCH}"
> >
> > with only TARGET_ARCH replaced with SDK_ARCH.
> >
> > Can we move "oecore" to extra varible like:
> >
> > bitbake.conf:
> > -SDK_NAME = "oecore-${SDK_ARCH}-${TARGET_ARCH}"
> > +SDK_NAME_PREFIX = "oecore"
> > +SDK_NAME = "${SDK_NAME_PREFIX}-${SDK_ARCH}-${TARGET_ARCH}"
> >
> > meta-yocto/conf/distro/poky.conf:
> > -SDK_NAME = "${DISTRO}-${TCLIBC}-${SDK_ARCH}-${TARGET_ARCH}"
> > +SDK_NAME_PREFIX = "${DISTRO}-${TCLIBC}"
> >
> > SDK_PATH is worse:
> > meta/conf/bitbake.conf:SDKPATH = "/usr/local/${SDK_NAME}"
> > meta-yocto/conf/distro/poky.conf:SDKPATH = "/opt/${DISTRO}/${SDK_VERSION}"
> >
> > Maybe this patch is not going in right direction, but nobody replied in
> > "SDK confusion Was: [oe] [meta-oe] gdb-cross-canadian: build gdb with
> > python support"
> > thread so I have sent this version which works in default (distroless)
> > oe-core (and also for SHR as we don't override default SDK* variables.
>
> This last week has been a bit problematic with conference activities
> occupying many of the people who would normally have replied to that
> kind of thread.
I know and I wasn't complaining much about lack of responses :) rather
wanted to resend this 2 patches in form easy to test for everybody.
And I wanted to resend older Eric's patch for oe-core not .bbappend in
meta-oe, because I wanted to test it without any aditional layer (as
it first should work for distroless oe-core and not only for distributions
overwriting default configuration).
> I'm very worried that you're having to copy the base bitbake definitions
> as needing to do that is usually a sign there is some underlying more
> fundamental problem. We really need to find a better alternative.
>
> I therefore don't think the patch as it stands can go in but I do want
> to understand the problem and try and fix it in a way that addresses the
> issues. I'm probably not going to get a chance to look at things until
> next week though.
I've added SDK_NAME_PREFIX to bitbake.conf which is probably better to
overwrite then whole "oecore-${SDK_ARCH}-${TARGET_ARCH}" and I've moved
3 NATIVESDK_* variables from that .inc to bitbake.conf so it's easier to
see that those also need to be overwriten in consistent way, see
following patchset.
Cheers,
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
