On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 8:41 AM Alexander Kanavin <alex.kana...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 21 Oct 2022 at 16:05, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > > This patch is doing something else where its mapping and broadening > > the architecture to match crossbeam's understanding of it. > > Here issue is new where it does not yet realize that some > > architectures do not have 64bit atomics implemented. > > Here's crossbeam's own list: > > https://github.com/crossbeam-rs/crossbeam/blob/master/no_atomic.rs > > You can see that riscv32 is in NO_ATOMIC_64, and > crossbeam_atomic.patch ensures we use the list, so why do we need this > change?
Looking briefly over the code, my educated guess is that target names are still not matching rusts tuple uses riscv32gc but we use riscv32 > > Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#172030): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/172030 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/94464934/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
