Hi Mikko,
On 10/5/22 10:43, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 10:31:25AM +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote:
Hi Mikko,
On 10/4/22 17:27, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
It sets various environment variables correctly for openssl-native.
Signed-off-by: Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rap...@linaro.org>
---
documentation/ref-manual/classes.rst | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/documentation/ref-manual/classes.rst
b/documentation/ref-manual/classes.rst
index 11e0d472e8..5fc30f9233 100644
--- a/documentation/ref-manual/classes.rst
+++ b/documentation/ref-manual/classes.rst
@@ -1672,6 +1672,17 @@ one such example. However, being aware of this class can
reduce the
proliferation of different versions of similar classes across multiple
layers.
+.. _ref-classes-openssl-native:
+
+``openssl-native.bbclass``
+==================
+
+The ``openssl-native`` class supports using the native version of openssl
The :ref:`openssl-native <ref-classes-openssl-native>` class supports using
the native version of ``openssl``
The text and syntax was shamesly copied from the other class descriptions.
Sould those all be updated?
It's being worked on by Michael AFAIK (he sent a v1 of 30 patches last
week). In short, we want to have all mentions of classes and terms
(variables basically) using a link (:ref: for classes, :term: for
variables), even within the section defining the class or variable itself.
+built by the build system rather than support of the version provided
+by the build host. It helps setting environment variables for engines,
+modules, certificates etc correctly. For full certificate checking
+users should also add ``ca-certificates-native`` to :term:`DEPENDS`.
+
I could suggest:
"""
built by the Yocto Project instead of the one provided by the build host
distribution.
"""
I find "rather than support of the version..." confusing.
I think we could also replace the "It helps" sentence by stating that any
recipe requiring openssl to be run on the host should inherit this class
instead of just adding openssl-native to DEPENDS. Maybe that could even be a
new QA check?
I would still keep the last sentence though.
What do you think?
Yes, I can send a new version. I copied the text template form the other
class descriptions so maybe they need to be changed too.
Mmmm, would you be able to point me to which class descriptions you're
talking about? Not sure to understand what you're suggesting here :)
Cheers,
Quentin
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#171452):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/171452
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/94131410/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
